Some very early season awards

It's early, but I want to track some favorites for the all-star weekend....

ROOKIE GAME

Starters (first team): Griffin, Wall, Cousins, Fields, Bledsoe

Bench: Wes Johnson, Turner, Aminu, Favors

Greg Monroe, Xavier Henry - alternates

EAST ALL STARS

Starters: Garnett, LeBron, Dwight, D Rose, Wade

Definite Bench: Pierce, Amare, Rondo

Probably Bench: Granger, Horford, Noah, ?

Other possibilites: Joe Johnson, Josh Smith, Bosh, Brook Lopez, Wall, Ray Felton, Stephen Jackson, Brandon Jennings

Wow, I couldn't even think of a 12th guy. I'm hoping one of the poss guys steps up. This is a sad year. Bosh might make it even though he's been a disappointment (and Wade is too, but I can't find a better two guard).

WEST ALL STARS

Starters: Dirk, P Gasol, Durant, Kobe, Deron

Definite Bench: CP, Nash, Carmelo, Ginobli, Westbrook

Probably bench: (hard to say) two of the following bigs......

Big guys that are too hard to choose between: Scola, Millsap, David West, Griffin, K Love

Other possibilites: Monta, B Roy, Rudy Gay, Duncan

I can't pick two out of those big guys. Millsap and West are very similar. The others are putting up great stats on bad teams. Hard to believe Duncan isn't a lock, but his scoring is way down. He might get respect votes anyway.

Pro Sports Teams in Relation to Media Markets: Who's Hanging with the Big Boys?

Every so often, I like to look at the rankings for media markets in the US and compare them to the teams in every major sports league. Media markets are major cities, or a group of minor cities put together, ranked by number of viewers. Every individual media market must have its own broadcast television stations (NBC, ABC, CBS, FOX, and maybe CW and PBS) to be counted. For example, Lancaster is part of the central PA market (with Harrisburg and York) because it has its own NBC station, and Harrisburg has CBS and ABC and so forth. It is NOT considered an outreach of Philadelphia, even though that's the major city nearby. Allentown and Bethlehem do count for Philly, however, because they don't have their own local channels (save for a PBS or indy station).

 

These rankings include suburbs and surrounding areas, so television executives, marketers, and sports officials look at them more than just pure population for determining which cities have the most potential fans. There are a million other factors that go into where they put teams, of course, but this is a big one, and I like to check the media market rankings to see if they match up to teams. With 30 teams in most leagues (and 32 in the NFL), we would think that most sports would try to only try to have teams in the 30-35 biggest markets. But that's not always the case.....

 

Let's take a look at the biggest media markets and what teams they have. Cities with a Big-4 next to them mean that they have a team in all four major sports (NBA, NFL, MLB, NHL), although I don't really put hockey on the same level as the rest of them, and football is usually worth the most.

 

Here are Nielsen's 55 biggest media markets in 2010:

 

1. New York (big-4) (9 teams overall)

 

2. Los Angeles (not a big-4 right now, but soon, and they still have 6 overall)

 

3. Chicago (big-4) (5 overall)

 

These are the big three; they can hold multiple teams in one sport, have boatloads of money, and spend a lot. They get the goods.

 

4. Philadelphia (big-4)

 

Surprised? Yes, Philly, you are next in line after the big boys. I know it seems hard to believe sometimes, and it really pisses me off that it took so long for the Phillies to start spending cash, but my beloved city is 4th in the nation, ahead of many big names.

 

5. Dallas (big-4)

 

HATE, but they have money and they use it.

 

6. San Francisco - Oakland - San Jose (big-4, combined, overall 6 combined)

 

This study puts all three of these Bay Area cities together, which says something about how maybe they're overrated individually. Baseball and football have tried to cram 2 teams into this market, with sketchy results. Other than the Giants, they all need to find new stadiums. And they've ignored San Jose and the south land strip (Silicon Valley and such) of the Bay, which contributes a ton of people. If Philly and Dallas couldn't support more than one team in a sport, and they're ranked higher.... well, maybe having 2 teams in the Bay is not a great idea.

 

7. Boston (big-4)

 

They seem like one of the top 3 or 4, but they're actually a little lower on the list. They always have cash though.

 

8. Atlanta (big-4)

 

The old south's biggest city never seems to have great fan support, but it is big. A lot of these numbers are transplant yuppies, I'm guessing.

 

9. Washington  (big-4)

 

This study puts San Fran and Oakland together but separates Baltimore and Washington. (This is true for their major TV stations). Our nation's capital is still decently ranked, but seems like the weakest fan support of all the major northeast cities. Again, I think it's transplants... and certain undercover communists working to keep the Steel Curtain manifesto in power.

 

10. Houston (3 major)

 

As much as I hate Texas, I didn't think they deserved to lose the Oilers. They do well in other sports; you know they're gonna show up for football.

 

11. Detroit (big-4)

 

Still big, but they used to be higher. One of the great Big-4 cities of old has gone downhill. They still support everyone well, but that might change soon.

 

12. Phoenix (big-4)

 

People like going to Arizona. They keep rising in population. What's interesting is that they have a lot of retirees and transplants, yet they have better fan support then other cities of the same make-up such as San Diego and all the Florida towns. The only sport that suffered was football, but that was when they played in a college stadium and had horrible owners. But the Suns have always done well, baseball is a new hit, and the hockey team impressed Wayne Gretsky enough to buy it. My hat's off to you, Arizona, even though I have no interest in ever becoming part of that.

 

13. Seattle (2)

 

This is a travesty. One of the smartest, most-moved-to, and yet still sports-crazy cities has gotten shit on constantly throughout the past few years. Just look at where Oklahoma City is on this list and ask yourself why David Stern thought if was fine for the Sonics to move. Atrocious.

 

14. Tampa Bay (Tampa, St. Petersburg, Clearwater) (3 inc. hockey)

 

You may wonder why the hell there are 3 teams in Tampa. It's actually a decent-sized market, the biggest in Florida. It was almost in the top 10 at one point this decade. Yet no one goes to games, except the Bucs, and that's mainly because Florida loves football and they win games now. (They used to get sparse crowds in the old Big Sombrero.) No one cares that the Rays turned the corner, and I'm sure most people aren't even aware they they have a hockey team and that it won the Stanley Cup a few years ago. No matter. It's a big market, and so it gets teams.

 

15. Minnesota Twin Cities (Minneapolis, St. Paul) (big-4)

 

People seem to think of the Minnesota teams as small market, but they're not so bad. And they have all 4 sports. I think it's just because the Twins owner is/was such a cheap ass.

 

16. Denver (big-4)

 

Good sports town, not huge, but it helps to be the only major city for a lot of rocky mountain area.

 

17. Miami (big-4)

 

Possibly the most overrated place on this list. They're not huge - as we saw earlier, not even the biggest in Florida anymore - and their fan support is downright awful. They can't sell basketball tickets even with a big name team that spends, and they can't sell baseball tickets even with a large Cuban population and lots of local talent and good weather. They act like a major player and somehow have a hockey team even though the numbers suggest otherwise. We'll see how they do with future years of the Heat project and a new Marlins stadium due soon.

 

18. Cleveland (major 3)

 

I thought they'd get number 13, but hey, it's not like Seattle has has much better luck. Cleveland is a decent sized town that gets a lot of crap. Note that LeBron turned down his hometown to move up just one place on this list, to a city with MUCH worse fans, (and also turned down New York and Chicago), but considered it a good business move. Sucker.

 

19. Orlando (1)

 

This may be another big surprise for you. Orlando doesn't inspire much imagination besides boy bands and theme parks. Well, it's almost as big as Miami, and bigger than a lot of more famous cities. The NBA took advantage of this and put their second Florida team here instead of Tampa, and it's worked out well for them.

 

20. Sacramento (1)

 

Another surprise. No one thinks of Sacto as a major city, but this is California's third largest market, not San Diego. With this area, comprised of Sacto, Modesto, and Stockton, along with another one nearby in Fresno, there are actually a lot of people not on the coast in CA. The NBA once again took advantage of this fact and, instead of putting a second team in the Bay Area, had a team move out here, where it received more attention. Unfortunately, it looks like the Kings may be moving soon. I'm surprised more teams don't consider this, especially as an alternative to the Bay, although I hear that the A's are looking to move so that they are in between Oakland and here to tap into this market. That's a good idea for them.

 

21. St. Louis (3 inc. hockey)

 

We're in middle range here. St. Louis seems like a classic sports town, but it's not that huge. They support their teams and spend well though.

 

22. Portland (1)

 

One of the nicest cities is also one of the largest with only one team - and unlike Orlando or Sacramento, there isn't another major market nearby to squelch off of. Portland is a mid-sized city but seems to be forgotten in the Northwest behind Seattle. They should have more.

 

23. Pittsburgh (3 inc. hockey)

 

Western Pennsylvania's big city is not as big as you might think. I had to spend a half hour convincing my annoying neighbor, a diehard Pitt fan, that it was not nearly as big as Philly. When the Pirates and Penguins claimed hardship, they weren't kidding, although the Pirates could do better. They're not the smallest, exactly....

 

24. Indianapolis (2)

 

Indiana has been mocked, and isn't huge, but is not a terrible market. This is a decent spot for them, and they only have 2 teams.

 

25. Charlotte (2)

26. Raleigh-Durham (1)

 

Maybe the biggest surprise for me was how the Carolinas had not just one, but several decent sized markets on this list. These two are individually bigger than some well-known cities, and put together, they'd be formidable. That's why North Carolina has 3 teams, in everything but baseball. Yet the Carolinas don't seem that big individually as states.... weird... (and look at numbers 36 and 46....)

 

27. Baltimore (2)

 

Separated from Washington, Baltimore is a medium market. 2 teams sounds right. Maybe they shouldn't have expected so much from Peter Angelos.

 

28. San Diego (2)

 

My favorite city to visit is not all that big and not all that caring. It's too bad, because this is one of the finest places to be, and to watch games. It might be the best baseball experience in the country. Apathy may be due to beaches nearby and transplants, and the population isn't as grandiose as LA (and other cities with transplants) to overcome it. Sad, but I don't think these teams are going to move, because their owners would probably lose a few bucks just to stay there. It's hard to leave.

 

29. Nashville (2)

 

I don't know why they have hockey, and I wouldn't take them over Houston, but I would say they are big enough to warrant a football team, given their college history and pro support. I think most teams factor in the other cities in Tennessee when deciding to come here, although they need to realize that Nashville and Memphis don't really like each other and have very different populations.

 

30. Hartford

 

Well, well, well. Connecticut has something besides highways connecting New York to New England. Hartford-New Haven is, in fact, the biggest market not to have a pro sports team. New York gets 3 hockey teams and they have none? That's messed up. Bring back the Whalers! LONG LIVE THE MIGHTY WHALE!

 

31. Salt Lake City (1)

 

They've grown a lot, which makes sense because half their population is obsessed with having as many pasty babies as possible. SLC used to be a small market the NBA capitalized on, but at this spot, they're not that terribly small. Would anyone else dare to come here? They're bigger than some other name cities.

 

32. Kansas City (2)

 

Like their brother on the other side of Missouri, this is a classic sports town that is not really that huge.. and they're even smaller than St. Louis. They've been trying to get an NBA team, but this would be a small market to support 3 teams, especially when the Royals are barely hanging on.

 

33. Cincinnati (2)

34. Columbus (1)

 

Yikes. All the jokes about how Cincinnati makes Cleveland look good, and yet the numbers show they aren't nearly as big as their Ohio rival and are, amazingly, very close to being passed as number 2 in the state. That hurts. To be fair, even though the numbers are similar, I think still think of Columbus as a big college town, rather than a pro sports city, and I know Cincy still gets a lot of support from nearby Kentucky. They support 2 teams, but they're lucky they have them. Tradition helps. I do appreciate the NHL's logic in going for Columbus over Cincy and Cleveland. They couldn't do hockey. Then again, that team could disappear and I don't think anyone would notice.

 

35. Milwaukee (2)

 

The birthplace of many beers is on the smaller side, but seems to draw people. Don't forget that they essentially have the Packers as well. They're the main NFL team in this city. This is not a huge market, right on the cusp of being really small, but it's another classic Midwestern city with good fans.

 

36. Greenville, South Carolina- Asheville, North Carolina

 

I had to look this one up on the map. This is an area of Western North Carolina and Northwestern South Carolina that groups 4 cities together - Greenville, Asheville, Spartanburg, and Anderson. I have no knowledge on any of them. But, in this metro area, there are more people put together than in same famous cities. I wasn't aware South Carolina had metro areas, but add them to the Carolina total.

 

37. San Antonio (1)

 

Here's where the markets really get small and questionable. San Antonio has been a nice home for the NBA, and they might have a shot at a football team someday, but given that they have to fight with Houston and Dallas, it's tough.

 

38. West Palm Beach, Florida

 

Isn't this part of Miami metro? I guess not for this study. Well, that's probably where they would go. I'd count them for Miami for fans.

 

39. Harrisburg-Central PA

 

DISTRICT 3 REPRESENT!

 

When I was graduating high school, my one English teacher told me that I should look into interning at Lancaster's NBC station, which is not that far from my parents' house. I replied that I was going to school in Philly so that I would never have to work in this godforesaken town again, and that I'd rather see what happens in a real city. She told me that Lancaster was actually a very good market to start out in, and that most newly hired communication graduates don't even come close to starting out in a market this size. Well, she was right. It didn't matter because I never wanted to work in live broadcast TV, but her point was made - Lancaster-Harrisburg-York-Lebanon, put together, has more people than a lot of cities.

 

I guess this makes sense, given how much my home area has grown. There are so many burbs popping up between Chambersburg and Reading, and they're appearing without a lot of major cities or towns to be structured around. Harrisburg isn't that big, but the population in Dauphin and Cumberland counties keeps going up. I did not come from the sticks, as many people have incorrectly noted. I came from middle and upper class burbs in an area that has been booming for nearly 30 years. Now it's bigger than some famous places.

 

(Hey David Stern, we have more people than Oklahoma City! Maybe you should give us a team with Kevin Durant, you fucking prick.)

 

40. Birmingham, Alabama

41. Grand Rapids - Kalamazoo, Michigan

 

...then again, maybe we shouldn't be so proud of ourselves.

 

42. Las Vegas

 

Some have speculated that Vegas will get a pro team soon. They're not big, although they are bigger than some pro cities. I want to see it just for the hilarious scandal potential. It's a bad mix waiting to happen.

 

43. Hampton Rhodes, Virginia

 

I expected this area, which includes Norfolk, Chesapeake, Portsmouth, Newport News, Virginia Beach, and Hampton, to be a little higher. My brother lives in Virginia Beach and it seems like a fast-growing area. They're bigger than they used to be, but I don't think they will get a pro team because they have a lot of transplants (especially for the Naval Base) and most locals root for the D.C. teams anyway. But it's a nice place for minor leagues.

 

44. Albuquerque - Santa Fe

 

They still have the Isotopes!

 

(No, really, they do.)

 

45. Oklahoma City (1)

 

And here we are, David Stern! This city has rabidly supported the NBA, but it's just not that big, and it's gotten a really promising team with a superstar in place. It's not a fair deal. The NBA has done well in small markets with no other pro team in town, but this is really low on the list.

 

46. Greensboro - Winston-Salem, North Carolina

 

Okay! North Carolina! I get it!

 

47. Jacksonville (1)

 

Maybe the most puzzling expansion choice ever? Seriously, I know Florida loves football, but they don't support other sports, and they already had 2 teams. People were just starting to accept the Bucs when the NFL awarded an expansion team to Jax, which is way below the other Florida cities. Orlando maybe, but here? They've had decent fan support, but this is now universally seen as a college town with no business having any pro teams. It was a major problem during their hosting duties for the Super Bowl; they just weren't big enough to hold everyone.

 

What's even more astonishing is that they were chosen over Baltimore and St. Louis, two much bigger cities with plenty of tradition. Those snubs allowed owners from other teams to later jettison their teams to fill in those heartbroken towns. If the NFL had just given the second spot to St. Louis in 1993, the Rams would still be in LA, the divisions would make a lot more sense, and the league wouldn't have to come up with an excuse for why they didn't have a team in the second biggest market. I'd be more angry but it seems like this team is gone soon anyway, so things will eventually even themselves out. They'll probably switch divisions with the Rams, or others will be moved, and it will be ok. But they could have avoided all of this.

 

Sorry Jacksonville, you're just in a weird place.

 

48. Austin

 

Too bad the only cool city in Texas is too small to have any teams.

 

49. Louisville

 

I think the NBA considered going here.... I wouldn't do it. But then, they've been in smaller places. Such as...

 

50. Memphis (1)

 

Tennessee has been a hot place for teams, but Memphis is significantly smaller than Nashville. Even if they do get people from other parts of the state, and from surrounding states like Arkansas and Mississippi, they're awfully small. Memphis is a great college basketball town with local talent, but it's been hard for the NBA. They actually had a decent team a few years ago before they gave up Pau Gasol just to save cash. Now they have a nice foundation again, but who knows how long they will keep it together. This is a really questionable spot.

 

51. Buffalo (2)

 

This seems like a really low place for anyone to have a team, let alone two teams. But I give hockey a pass because this is the kind of place that should have hockey. And I give the Bills a pass because they're trying to draw fans from Toronto, which doesn't show up on any list because it's Canada but has potentially more fans than anyone outside the top 5. They're tried to play a few games in Toronto to get fans there to watch and make the trek across the border. I don't know if they've really benefited from that, but even if they can get a small percentage of Canadians to watch, that would be a big gain.

 

Upstate New Yorkers are worried that this team will leave or move to Toronto for good, but I don't think the NFL wants to deal with actually being in Canada. They just want Canada's English-speaking, American-football-accepting fans to watch and buy stuff. It may work. If so, they'll probably stay where they are and try to score deals with Toronto TV stations.

 

[By the way, Toronto doesn't show up on this list but has 3 pro teams, and they spend money reasonably well, so technically they should be considered a very good market.]

 

[[And now that the Grizzlies are gone from Vancouver, and the Montreal Expos are no more, Toronto is the only Canadian city to have teams from leagues besides hockey.]]

 

52. New Orleans (2)

 

They've obviously dropped a lot in the past few years. But even before Katrina, they were not that big. I think they were around # 43 in the early part of the decade. Nawlins is one of the most unique and important cities in America, but it has never been that huge. Now, as the city struggles to rebuild, having 2 major teams seems like a lot of work. They are the smallest pro city on this list, and certainly the smallest to have 2 non-hockey teams BY FAR.

 

I hate to say no to New Orleans. They have good fans who have been through a lot. The Saints have a lot of history, even if much of it is bad, and a strong connection to the area. They should stay, and I think they will now. The Hornets have barely been there, and never should have left Charlotte in the first place, but their owner is a horrible dick and he decided to come here. I don't know if they will stay. If Chris Paul leaves, they might have to move on as well.

 

 53. Providence

 

Boston fans with their own fun college teams.

 

54. Scranton

55. Fresno

 

I'm gonna wrap this up now. If you can't beat Fresno or Scranton, I don't think you should have a pro team in anything. The only pro city left on this list is Green Bay at # 70, but as I said, I think they should count with Milwaukee. The Packers have a monopoly on the whole state of Wisconsin, right? I have to think that at least 90 % of the locals in Milwaukee and Madison are wearing green.

 

-----

 

So what does this tell us? We can see certain trends amongst the different leagues. The NBA takes more chances with small markets, although the NFL supports a few as well. Baseball tries to go for major cities. The NHL takes the major American markets, but doesn't appear everywhere because they have to put a couple teams in Canada (and there really should be more).

 

But, focusing on the major three leagues, allow me to make a point about the schedules: the NFL plays 16 games a year; the NBA, 82; and baseball goes for 162. Because football is usually played on the weekends, it allows itself bigger crowds from a larger area. People can use their weekend to travel to the game, and so it might not matter as much if they are in a big city. Green Bay gets fans from not just all over Wisconsin, but all over the mid west. It's the same reason why college football can exist in places like Nebraska and Iowa and Oklahoma and Alabama: less people have work on the weekends and thus have time to travel to games. Baseball, however, has to attract fans every night. They like being in major population centers where they can bring in daily workers and occasional families making a special trip. The NBA also has to do this, having many weeknight games. It's why the Eagles can have fans from all over the Eastern seaboard but the Sixers get people who mostly live in or close to the city.

 

Knowing this, it's interesting to note that the NBA and MLB have very different plans. Look at how many NBA teams are in a market where they are the only major sports team - Orlando, Sacramento, Portland, Utah, San Antonio, Oklahoma City, Memphis. They were also the first league to put teams in Phoenix, Indiana, Seattle (about the same time as that failed Seattle Pilots attempt) and North Carolina. They have tried to find new markets and capitalize on middle and smaller markets that had nothing else. Meanwhile, baseball refuses to be the only game in town. All of their teams are in a market with another major sports team. Since 1970, (when the NFL and AFL merged to make football super powerful and the NBA started adding a bunch of teams), the MLB has never placed a team in a city that didn't have any other major teams. They are the only league that doesn't have a team ranked lower than 40 (Milwaukee is the smallest at 35). Yet the teams low on their list often complain about being overlooked, while in the NBA, a lot of those smaller markets have done well. The salary cap helps, but it's worth noting.

 

It looks like most of these leagues are done trying expansion for a while. The NBA and MLB would probably drop a few teams before adding any soon, but they most likely won't. The NFL is making the most cash, but 32 teams works out so well for them mathematically that it would be hard for them to add 1 or 2 more. This means that we're probably stuck with the same number of franchises for a while, and the only way to get different markets will be moves. Which will happen next? The Jaguars to LA? The Vikings?? (I hope not). Sacto may become Vegas or Kansas City (which they ironically once were). Whatever happens, I hope this list gives you an idea on where we stand in regards to media markets and team locations.

whoops! a correction

Well, I realized that my NBA preview is flawed in a small way. I had Miami, Orlando, and Atlanta as the top 3 seeds in the East. That is technically impossible. They all play in the same division, so that means that one of them would be a 5 seed. The NBA gives the top 4 seeds in each conference to the division winners plus the best wild card, in order of record. Then, everyone else starts at 5. They did this after they realized how bad it would be if the best 2 teams in the conference would be in the same division (and it happened a lot with San Antonio and Dallas in those first few years after they switched to 6 divisions).

I feel especially stupid because I was just explaining to someone how, in 2007, the top three teams in the East were all in the same division (Pistons, Cavs, Bulls) and the way it worked out may have helped the Cavs get to the finals. The Bulls were just behind the Cavs for the number 2 spot but had to settle for the 5th seed.

So, if Miami, Orlando, and Atlanta finish with the three best records in the East, the worst of them still gets the 5th seed. I thought about this after they all got off to good starts. BUT, the Celtics are off to a good start as well, so they might be in there. I expected Boston and Chicago to win their divisions easily, so they would get the 3 and 4 seeds. This setup might help the Celtics get a 3 seed even more easily, and propel them to the conference finals.

Leo's 2011 NBA Preview: Recipe for Hate

Hate.

That's the word I keep thinking about in watching the league during this off season. I'm not just talking about LeBron's I Am The Most Important Person in The World special, the Heat hate, the continued erosion of the Sixers, or the ongoing Melo-drama. I mean, all of these are certainly part of it, but there's so much about the league EVERYWHERE that is bothering me. I'm disappointed in almost every team. This is an angry time of my basketball life. I'm as intrigued as ever to see what happens, but I'm pissed.

Yes, every team has a reason to be hated. Every team has done something to make me despise their existence. Every team has at least one thing I can complain about. Some teams made good moves, but there's no way to satisfy my internal flame. So I present a quick preview on every team, measured on my personal hate-o-meter, and also some less important things, like how many wins they'll have.

WEST

Los Angeles Lakers

HATE LEVEL: 10 of 10

I HATE: It sucks living in LA when the Lakers are good. Granted, there aren't many times when they are bad, but when they actually win titles, the city gets to an extra level of annoying. People put flags all over their car, slowing down an already-suffocating road system; drunken assholes of all races and professions march down the street like they were the ones playing in the game; and people who really don't care or know anything about sports awkwardly try to strike up conversations or talk about the team in interviews and IT ALL SUCKS. None of these people realize that the only way the Lakers became relevant again is because Chris Wallace gave up way too early on a franchise big man and settled for crap, more crap, and payroll relief. No, I still haven't gotten over that one.

As for the team itself, I wish there was something bad I could say or some hope of them slipping, but it just ain't gonna happen. They made two very smart moves in bringing in Steve Blake to back up Derek Fisher and Matt Barnes to serve as Ron Artest insurance. Both of these guys fit, and at positions they need depth. And just when they didn't deserve it, they got Shannon Brown back at a decent price. Teams that win titles should not be able to pick up people so easily. I wish there was a team out West who could challenge them, but there isn't. Dallas isn't quite good enough, OKC is another year away (and doesn't have the bigs), San Antonio is old, Denver is about to implode, Utah doesn't have the wings, Phoenix lost Amare, and Houston still has injury problems. They will win this conference easily, barring any major catastrophes. They already proved they were above the Magic two years ago, and Orlando hasn't really gotten better. The only teams in the league that can really take them are the Celtics or Heat, two teams I don't much like either. Hate. I hate.

[One reason I didn't extend the hate: Mychal Thompson. He's been fun. He's developed an almost Uecker-like level of self-parody for his career, which wasn't really that bad, but he has a good time. He always sounds like he's got his shoes off and is lying back with a pina colada. I can listen to him. I even made him my avatar/mascot for my fantasy team. Pride of the Bahamas!]

PROJECTED WINS: 60

Dallas Mavericks

HATE LEVEL: 5

I HATE: I should hate this team, considering they play in Dallas. But I like Cuban, I have respect for Nowitzki and Kidd, and they're a nice foil for the Lakers and Spurs' combined dominance of the West this decade. They've been on the cusp of being a serious contender the past few years, ever since they got knocked out by Golden State, but this might be their best shot at getting back to the finals. I don't think they can beat the Lakers, but they probably can make it to the conference finals. If anything, I hate them for not putting it together quite enough to beat LA.

The Mavs have changed their philosophy a couple of times this decade, but I think they have a good roster right now. They started out by trying to acquire as many good pieces as possible, regardless of how they played together. This led to weird teams where solid guys like Antoine Walker and Antawn Jamison didn't have a spot. Then they tried to get a balanced team of supporting players around Dirk. This got them to the finals and the best record the next year, but they eventually gave it up. Last year, it seemed like they wanted to put out a small lineup again, but they tweaked it at the deadline. Now they have two decent centers (if Tyson Chandler is healthy, but he doesn't have to be 100% to help), a nice collection of shooters, defenders, a real point guard in Kidd, and some interesting young guys. The only guy who might not fit in is Caron Butler. He's not a guard, and he clashes with the offense sometimes. But he has an expiring deal and some value, so he'll probably be traded at some point. I'm sure Cuban will make more deals, but I don't know if it will be enough. With all the turmoil in the rest of the conference, I give them the runner-up spot.

PROJECTED WINS: 56

Not Seattle Sonics

HATE LEVEL: 8

I HATE: Ok, most of that hate is because this exciting team is not in Seattle anymore. One of the few great basketball hotbeds got a peek at one of the league's hottest new stars and then watched him go away. Not fair. Considering the last few markets to get NBA teams (Toronto, Vancouver-Memphis, New Orleans, Charlotte's retread, OKC), doesn't Oklahoma City get the best situation out of all of them? How does that happen? The good people of Seattle deserve much better, and while I think OKC has proved itself as a decent small market, they haven't had any ugly losing periods beyond their honeymoon to sour them. All those other cities had to deal with some awful teams without any stars. You guys got one Kevin Durant gift-wrapped to you. I hate. I HATE.

Actually, I do have some actual concerns about this team. I'm not sure what the ceiling is on some of their young guys. I have to compare them to Portland, their natural rival and the team before them that was getting all the buzz as being the brightest up-and-coming bunch. After last year, people had soured on Portland a little, realizing that they don't have any real stars besides Roy. I wonder if maybe this is the season where OKC's luster rubs off a little and people realize they don't have anything special besides Durant. You need at least two all stars to be a contender, and I don't know if Jeff Green or Russell Westbrook will ever be there. They are good, and Westbrook did make splashes on the national team, but I want to see more of them before I decide. This team also has a lot of question marks down low. At least Portland has Oden and Camby to protect them. This team has a jump shooter who doesn't go down low (Kristic) undersized forward types (Collison, White, Aldrich) and wild cards with big potential but no clue (Mullens, Ibaka). If no one steps up, they have a real size problem, especially since Durant and Green are natural small forwards (though big ones). Even though they put a scare into the Lakers, they got pummeled inside and will not be a real contender until they get some bigs. Everyone wants to see them in the conference finals and challenge the Lakers, but I put them a shade below until I see more. They are very good, I just want to make sure.

Projected wins: 54

Utah Jazz

Hate level: 5

I HATE: I love the beautiful state of Utah and its fantastic drivers! What could you hate? This team always seems to be in the middle of the playoffs, 4 or 5 seed, right around 50 wins. I thought Boozer leaving might drop them a tad, but they turned around and pulled off a shocking heist of Al Jefferson. Even though they had been trying to save money, they couldn't pass up a deal that good.

Maybe the most hatable thing about this team is that they make good moves, but always take one step back when they take one forward. It's got to be frustrating to their fans. Last year, they gave up quality young guards Ronnie Brewer and Eric Maynor for nothing just to get some cap relief. Their backcourt depth remains unsettled, although late pickups of Raja Bell and Earl Watson help. They drafted Next White Hope Gordon Hayward, but lost Previous White Hope Kyle Korver. They can't settle on a starting off guard, yet they always have big guys.

I think they're waiting for Kirilenko's contract to be over so they can make some decisions, but until then, they seem to be stuck. They have the big guys to throw at the Lakers, but not the wings. They'll be at the same place they have been.

Projected wins: 51

Portland Trail Blazers

Hate level: 6

I HATE: Ohh, the golden boys have lost their shine! For a few years, everyone talked about them as The Next Big Thing. They were supposed to take down the Lakers and build a new dynasty. Then, last year, you could hear the stampede leaving town and heading for Oklahoma. Is anyone left on the Blazer bandwagon?

This team isn't that bad; in fact, they are a quality bet to get to 50 wins. But no one is thinking of them as a contender anymore. They never found the third scorer to help Brandon Roy and LaMarcus Aldridge. They haven't gotten much out of once-hyped Euros Nicolas Batum and Rudy Fernandez. Andre Miller is a good point guard but a bad fit here. Greg Oden showed some poise but his injury history makes you think that anything can happen. At least they picked up Marcus Camby for depth.

I think they're going to hover around 50 wins and a middle playoff seed until they figure the roster out. With all those wings, they still signed Wes Matthews to a big deal, which was very confusing. They probably will trade Rudy at some point (don't they have to now?) and they will see if either of their rookies are worth it. This is not a bad team, but the magic, and Kevin Pritchard, are gone, and suddenly their future is not so bright. Poor Portland. A nice city deserves better. They had so much excitement and now they have so many questions. Well, at least you're not Seattle.

Projected wins: 50

San Antonio Spurs

Hate level: 4

I HATE: No reason to hate the Spurs anymore, because they are on the way down. They've been sinking for the past few years, and have the early playoff exits to show for it. Last year they got a small measure of revenge on Dallas from the year before, but were swept by their once inferior rival Suns. I don't think there's much left here. The only real reason to watch is to see if Tiago Splitter, talked about for years, is worth the hype. He could rejuvenate them a little. This roster is fine, with the big three still (mostly) holding down the fort and Richard Jefferson, though kind of a waste, providing some energy on the wings. I will look to see if they work any youngsters into the rotation, including first round pick James Anderson, Splitter, and onetime La Salle recruit Gary Neal. With Tony Parker approaching free agency and getting plenty of interest, this is the last hurrah for the Spurs as we've known them for the past few years. They could make a minor surprise run, but there's no real reason to project it with the way they've looked.

Projected wins: 48

New Orleans Hornets

Hate level: 6

I HATE: George Shinn. He's always been a bastard. He spends money and then criticizes it. He ruined a perfectly good situation in Charlotte, backed LJ over Zo (bad idea) and then traded him anyway, denied Michael Jordan a much better comeback story, and alienated one of the most loyal and zealous fan bases within a few years of creating the team. Since he came to New Orleans, he's been alternating in handing out dumb contracts and then dumping salary. He doesn't deserve to have a team. He doesn't deserve to have Chris Paul. When rumors started that CP wanted out, I figured that CP would be gone. After all, what has Shinn done whenever his star players have complained? Dumped them. For nothing.

I was figuring out trade machine deals for Paul to the Knicks when a funny thing happened: Shinn said he was selling (WHY DID IT TAKE YOU THIS FUCKING LONG??) the team, and the Hornets pulled off a sly trade to get Trevor Ariza and Marco Bellinelli while dumping James Posey off the books. They also gave up Darren Collison, who would've been a much cheaper replacement for CP if he left. They brought in a new coach and GM and promised CP that everything would be better. He calmed down.

So now what? The Hornets stand to have some decent wings surrounding Paul. He's never had an athletic finisher like Ariza, and Marcus Thornton got some nice looks as the off guard last year. He still has David West. Emeka Okafor was a disappointment, but is not a terrible player. They picked up Jerryd Bayless for depth and will probably have Jannero Pargo back. I kind of like this team, even if I don't know about frontcourt depth. They still have Peja off the bench, and it's nice that they don't have to depend on him to play a lot. Maybe he will be good in limited time. I just have a feeling that with CP back for a full year and a decent lineup, they can sneak into the playoffs. It's possible. Now just get Shinn out of there.

Projected wins: 46

Houston Rockets

Hate Level: 5

I HATE: I hate fate for cursing them. This is the team - not Dallas, not Denver, not anyone else - that should have been challenging the Lakers the past few years. Daryl Morey inherited a team with two star players and nothing else, and spent the past few years doing a wonderful job surrounding them with talent. He built up a team with no assets and low draft picks to get the necessary supporting players to those stars. But, just when they had a strong supporting cast, the two stars fell off the face of the Earth with injuries and weird problems. If the Yao Ming and Tracy McGrady of 2005-07 had the supporting cast of 2009-10, they might have mounted a real threat to the Lakers. But no. It just didn't work out. Now Houston has a collection of supporting players without the star base.

Last year, the Rockets impressed everyone by playing hard and scrapping without Yao or another big name. They had a lot of unknown parts that gelled and overachieved. They managed to later turn some of their parts into a decent wing, Kevin Martin. If they could just have Yao healthy for one year, I would list them as the second best team in the conference. But they already announced that they would be bringing him back slowly and limiting minutes. Once again, they will have to scrap and work hard, and I think that will get them back to where they just were. I like the back court of Martin and Aaron Brooks a lot. I'm surprised they gave up on Ariza so quickly, but they clearly want shooters around their big guys and Courtney Lee is a nice wing to have. They have too many big guys to use, so I think there will be some more moves. If they can get another impact player, maybe that will make up for it. But they are going to have to hope that Yao is okay, and that's a risk.

Projected wins: 45

Phoenix Suns

Hate Level: 8

I HATE: Robert Sarver is another owner that's hard to figure out. He infamously dumped draft picks and refused to make a few small deals that would have put the Suns over the top during their glory Nash-Marion years, yet had no problem giving cash to questionable guys like Boris Diaw, Marcus Banks, and Shaq (who was older and didn't fit the system). This summer, he really made a weird play, letting Amare go and then spending on Hedo Turkoglu, Hakim Warrick, and Channing Frye. WHAT?? Amare may or may not be worth the cash, but for the amount they spent on those guys..... that's just weird. He dumped Steve Kerr, who was trying hard to revitalize the team, and now I have no idea where they go.

As much as he had problems on D and rebounding, Amare was valuable to this team for his inside scoring. They replaced him with a bunch of forwards who don't go down low, and aren't even much better on defense. Turkoglu is not really a four, and Hakim Warrick is a decent slasher who doesn't really have a spot either. Warrick was an especially weird signing because they already had Earl Clark, a similar player, and Jared Dudley, a combo forward who does a lot of the small things. They needed an inside guy if anything, and didn't get it. Robin Lopez is not a scorer. Turkoglu was good, then looked lost in Toronto, and even though he might look better playing next to Nash, I think he was mostly just in a good situation in Orlando that utilized him perfectly. I don't have much hope for him. Or this team.

Steve Nash deserves better. They have enough scoring to be a threat for the playoffs, but the pieces do not fit together. I think it's back to the lottery, although they will be close and could slip in.

Projected wins: 44

Memphis Grizzlies

Hate level: 4

I HATE: I really wanted to hate this team last year, but they surprised everyone by flirting with the playoffs and getting to the .500 mark. Their starting lineup was solid; Zach Randolph finally put it together enough to be an all-star, and they made some strides. They had no bench at all, but they've made a few moves to help that. They drafted wing Xavier Henry and signed defensive specialist Tony Allen. Haseem Thabeet looks like a bust, but with Marc Gasol looking fine, they may not need him to be more than a role player. They just need to build up the roster a little. One question: do they like Mike Conley? He's the one starter that hasn't been doing great. He hasn't been terrible, but he's the one questionable part. They haven't brought in any backups for him, so they must see something. Otherwise, I like this team and I think they just need a little more time.

Projected wins: 40

Denver Nuggets

Hate level: 8

I HATE: They're almost certainly going to lose Carmelo. The only issue is when. That will kill them for now. It's not all their fault for him wanting to leave. But they should be hated a little for how it all happened. They overspent on Nene and Kenyon Martin, which killed their chances of signing other people, especially when they already had Marcus Camby. Then they tried to dump everyone they could. It worked the past few years, as those guys finally got healthy and made the team into a contender. But trades like giving away Camby for nothing probably made Melo question where this team was going. They got Iverson as a weird fit, then smartly dumped him for Billups. They got a nice pickup of Ty Lawson. But they didn't get another big guy to help when Camby left, and that cost them.

In reality, the Nuggets had everything going for them when they made the conference finals two years ago. That was their peak and Melo had to see that. Even though they will have space this summer after Martin's horrendous deal finally runs out, he is gone. They can still salvage themselves with the right deal and a few draft picks, but they have to see that the time is over. It's hard to project wins because they could make a deal next week, or it could wait until February. Either way, I think there's enough dysfunction to keep them out of the playoffs.

Projected wins: 38 (pending)

Los Angeles Clippers

Hate level: 7

I HATE: I hate that the team I could be following closely is almost as depressing as my hometown team. They get so close, but they could be doing so much better. They could be a real rival to the Lakers. They could get out of the Staples Center, go to Anaheim, and grow their own fan base. They could be a real NBA team with an identity and not just living off the Lakers' sloppy seconds and discount tickets. But no, Donald Sterling, maybe the most hateable (and that's saying something) of all the hateable owners, just doesn't care. So they lose the chance to seriously pursue LeBron or Carmelo or someone great that could make them into a contender.

The irony is that they used to draft horrible players, but now have figured out how to do better... they just lose them one way or another. Eric Gordon, Blake Griffin, and Chris Kaman are good. They have built a nice team. They need a small forward, but they did draft Al-Faroq Aminu and he might help later. They need more now, but they have a nice base. They have the talent to make the playoffs, but will they? They're the Clippers.

Projected wins: 36

Golden State Warriors

Hate level: 5

I HATE: That the Warriors couldn't get a new owner until now. They've had fascinating teams since that takedown of the Mavs, but sucked. Now, they dumped a lot of guys and are trying over with three key players: Stephon Curry, David Lee, and Monta Ellis. They provide a lot of offense and no D. This is a nice fantasy team, and fun to watch, but they will continue to lose games until they rebuild things. After having about 8 shooting guards/wings on the roster last year, they are surprisingly weak on the wings. Dorrell Wright, who didn't do much in Miami despite some chances, is the new small forward. Reggie Williams, who came on strong last year, is probably going to be the real guy there.

I like what they're doing, and they have a direction, but they need to start building up the roster with more guys.

Projected wins: 32

Sacramento Kings

Hate level: 7

I HATE: I didn't hate much until I remembered that this team made me look dumb... and is probably moving. They really impressed me last year, looking like a team with a bright future. I berated them for not taking Ricky Rubio in the draft. Whoops! Tyreke Evans was awesome and looked like a real franchise player. I didn't like them having to give up Kevin Martin to fit him in, but they'll be able to find a shooter to put next to him. With the drafting of DeMarcus Cousins, and the steal of Omri Casspi, they have a solid foundation. They also have depth on the front line with Carl Landry, Jason Thompson, Sam Dalembert, Donte Greene, and maybe steal Hassan Whiteside. They need some guard depth, but that's about it. They will struggle now, but they are building.

Last year, I was ready to declare them the worst and least-talented team in the league. Now, they have a promising base. And right when that happens, they're gonna move. Horrible. There is nothing but hate in this league.

Projected wins: 28

Minnesota Timberwolves

Hate level: 30

I HATE: Everything about this sorry joke of a franchise. Was it really not that long ago that they were the at the top of the conference? Well, six years. That's a lot in NBA terms. Since they did that, they've fallen into a worse abyss than they had pre-KG. They have the worst roster on paper, the least amount of talent, the biggest scoring problems, and no franchise player to speak of other than Kevin Love, and I don't know if he fits that bill. Instead of drafting a quality big man or trading up to get Evan Turner, they settled for Wesley Johnson, a serviceable wing but a guy who should never be a key component on a team. They dumped Al Jefferson, the only guy who was even close to being an all-star, for almost nothing. They claimed that he couldn't play together with Love. I'm not sure about that, but I feel even more dubious about Michael Beasley fitting in with Love. That is a bad mix. They have some guard depth now, but no one is really that good. They have a lot of mediocre guys who should be 8th or 9th men in key positions. I don't even want to touch the center spot, where infamous stiffs Darko (he only needs one name) and Kostas Koufos will try to show... anything? Something!

David Kahn has quickly become a running joke, and it's for a reason. They have no direction. The Jefferson trade not only cost them their best player, but it also basically ruined the remains of the KG deal. With Ryan Gomes gone, the Wolves have nothing left to show for trading away the best player in franchise history three years after it happened. Terrible. I haven't even gotten to the Ricky Rubio fiasco yet. They mishandled that horribly, as drafting Jonny Flynn was a big problem. At least Stephon Curry would be better and could play some off guard to entice Rubio. Now, he has no reason to come here and I don't see why he would. Flynn is solid but they blew two top picks with that selection. Now they need to get lucky in the draft.

I think they're going to be historically bad. The Nets won 12 games last year with better players, and they were in an easier conference. The Wolves managed only 15 wins with Jefferson and Gomes, two guys who at least provided some scoring. Unless Beasley makes a huge leap, I think they should be even worse.

Projected wins: 10. Not kidding.

EAST

Miami Heat

Hate level: 50

I HATE: Yeah, I'm on the Heat Haters bandwagon. I still can't wrap my head around this. I am curious to see how they will do, but I know they are going to kill people. I already wrote about this in my last column after the big decision was announced. They are going to be good and they are going to win. Everyone hoping for them to fall apart is going to be disappointed. They have too much, and they have some role players now to balance it out. They won't win the title without a real center, but they can easily get the best record in the East and I like them better than almost every team. Orlando and Boston will be tough in certain spots, but if LeBron almost took them down by himself, what's going to happen when he goes at them with two other stars? It's not going to be pretty. I'm tired of talking about them. I'm sure we'll hear a million things more.

Projected wins: 62

Orlando Magic

Hate level: 4

I HATE: Their new arena is furnished by a guy who runs a giant pyramid scheme. So that's cool. This team is in a weird spot. Just as they were happy to realize they had an advantage over Cleveland, they got a reminder that it wouldn't be the same against Boston with a healthy KG. Then, LeBron pulled the rug out on everyone. People are trying to back them as the team that can take down the Heat, but really, they're the third best team in the East (even if the records won't say so).

I'm not saying their finals appearance was a fluke, as they played great that year and shot unbelievably well, but they had to know they got a little luck with no KG and them being a matchup nightmare for Cleveland. To their credit, they did not stand still after that great run. They tried to make themselves better and deeper. Most teams wouldn't have been so bold. But now, they have an aging Vince Carter and a lineup that doesn't have all the quirks it did.

I know, I know, they have Dwight Howard and he can kill the Heat. But then, who does Rashard Lewis guard? Who do they have besides Mickael Pietrus to stop LeBron and Wade? I don't buy it. And the Celtics proved who was the best in their matchup.

I can see them getting 60 wins, I can see them having the best record in the conference and maybe the league, but unless Boston and Miami have serious problems, I don't think this is a finals team.

Projected wins: 60

Atlanta Hawks

Hate level: 6

I HATE: This franchise has made a big circle. In the late 90's, they put together a bunch of respectable teams that always made the playoffs and usually even advanced one round. They were solid and always seemed like one piece away from a contender. Yet they didn't attract fans and were seen as boring. So, to shake things up, they traded for (sentimental blogger favorite) Isiah Rider, which failed horribly, then Shareef Abdur-Rahim, which failed, but not that horribly, just kind of almost being there. Then they tanked one year too late to get the real prize (local stud Dwight Howard) but amazingly passed up the chance to get Chris Paul when they really needed a point guard. They suffered and suffered until finally they built a decent smallball team that won 50 games and advanced to the second round the past two years.

So….

Now they're in that holding pattern again. Most people have them in the same spot or sliding just a bit. No one thinks of them as a contender, just another team that will make the playoffs and scare no one. I'm still shocked that Joe Johnson came back here and even more shocked that they ponied up for him. They don't mind the notion that they're ok where they are. Don't they remember how it turned out last time?

I'm putting them third because I think they might just make a little improvement this year. I like Jordan Crawford as a rookie, and they brought in some bigs to help up front. But their base as it is not going to get any farther, so unless they make big changes, they will do the same. They can't compete with the Heat, Magic, or Celtics in the playoffs.

I'm just waiting for them to make that trade for Michael Beasley or Arenas in a few years.

Projected wins: 54

Boston Celtics: 5

I HATE: That they couldn't pull it off, and that I even wanted them to in the first place. This franchise has 17 titles. I feel no sympathy for them. It was nice in a way for the big three to get their title two years ago. They've all been professionals and I don't hate them. I just wish it happened in a city where they didn't already have 30 Hall of Famers. But they're here, and now they're one of the teams counted on to challenge the new Heat power. I don't know.

I have a feeling that they are going to coast a little in the regular season again. They are old, they are saving themselves, and they know it.

There are some questions here. I wonder which big guy gets left out when Perkins comes back. Five is a lot. I also want to know how much each one has left. KG looked dead for most of last season and then pulled it together for the playoffs, only to fade a little at the end. I have doubts about both O'Neals, although Shaq still has some skills.

They got a huge break when Delonte West came limping back to them. He can shoot, defend, and play both guard spots. They really needed perimeter depth, and he's good.

They already proved they can take down the Magic with enough healthy people. They are the only team in the East that can stare down Miami…. But if they don't take the regular season seriously, they may face the Heat in the second round and not the conference finals. I don't know how that series goes then. They might have to slug it out vs. the Bulls or Bucks beforehand. I think the Heat have the advantage, but man, is that interesting.

It's so hard to say with this team. They looked dead all year and then managed to get within a few points of a title. I am going in between and saying they are a tough playoff team but don't make the finals.

Projected wins: 52

Chicago Bulls

Hate level: 4

I HATE: They finally got their scoring power forward and now they don't have enough guards. Frustrating. For years, they needed an inside scorer. Finally, they get to free agency, score nice with a not-quite-huge star, but get dumped on the other end. I thought they would get Joe Johnson, but no, and now they have another hole to fill.

Still, I do like this team, and I think they get to 50 wins. They brought in some depth, have some defense and shooters, and are going to play hard under Thibodeaux. Ronnie Brewer and Kyle Korver will tag team as they did in Utah for defense and shooting, but until Chicago gets a real two guard, they will be in the middle of the playoff pack.

Projected wins: 50

Milwaukee Bucks

Hate level: 7

I HATE: This franchise for constantly beguiling me. Last year I berated them for dumping people and drafting a string of bad point guards when they could've just had Chris Paul. They spent the past decade signing people to awful, terrible contracts, and then letting good players go for nothing to save cash. They have, on the whole, the most up-and-down front office history this decade. I declared them the worst team in the East and the least talented team in the league. I put them number one on my list of teams I would vote to be contracted.

Then the season started, and you know how that went. They surprised everyone on the way to the playoffs, and became a popular young team. Andrew Bogut finally made some progress and Brandon Jennings proved he was a point guard they should finally stick with. They got earnest contributions from some cheap pick ups like Carlos Delfino and Luc Richard Mbahohyouknow and scrapped along as some of their high-paid problems sat on the bench. They were such a feel good team.

I was really impressed with how John Hammond rebuilt this team in one year…. until the summer came and he abandoned his philosophy to hand out more contracts. He signed Drew Gooden and John Salmons, two guys with a lot of stops. He traded for Corey Magette, a highly paid scorer who doesn't do much else and hasn't won much. It seemed like he forgot everything he did and went back to the old Bucks style of giving up too much they'd regret later.

So, I don't know what to think of this team, and I'm tired of trying to figure out where they will go. They've surprised before, only to fall back the next year. I think they will be fine this year just because the conference is terrible, and Bogut and Jennings are for real, but I don't know how the new guys will fit. I'll call it a wash from the progress they made last year.

Projected wins: 45

New York Knicks

Hate level: 5

I HATE: That I felt so bad for these guys that I was rooting for them this summer. I used to love taunting Knicks fans, as I know quite a few, but it started to get sad after the mistakes of the old started to ruin the next few years. Isiah's infamous miscues ruined them in the short and long term. They didn't have enough assets to attract players, regardless of cap space, and they realized their dreams of getting LeBron and others was not going to end up well. Amare and Ray Felton just don't have the same ring.

But there is hope. While losing out on some big names, they did get Stoudemire to provide scoring inside they haven't had since Ewing. Felton, though no Chris Paul, is a solid point and much better than anyone they've had in a while. Throw in the progress of Wilson Chandler and Danillo Gallinari and they have a decent roster. They should have enough to make the playoffs in the East. And they will probably have a shot at landing Carmelo and maybe some other guys. Finally hope in New York.

I still give them a hate rating because I know those Knick fans will become unbearable again once they get players. They were cocky at first about the guys Isiah was bringing in, even though we all knew it was a bad idea. Also, James Dolan, by all accounts, is a spoiled asshole and let all this destruction happen. Don't get too comfy yet, New Yorkers.

Projected wins: 42

Charlotte Bobcats

Hate level: 6

I HATE: This team finally broke through and made the playoffs, and yet they remain a disappointing franchise. Even though they broke through, their talent level is just not that impressive. They had to give up key guys because they didn't want to pay for them, and are now hoping they have just enough to get by. Instead of building a foundation for the future, they scrapped together an older team just so they could taste the postseason. Now they're back to being just okay.

It's been a weird second stage for Charlotte in the NBA. The Hornets always had stars, even if George Shinn got rid of them. The Bobcats have never had a real superstar and have been filled with guys who were good but not amazing. Ray Felton was nice but was so uninteresting that they drafted D.J. Augustin high. Gerald Wallace finally became the first all-star last year, but he's not really a franchise player. They get by with these guys who had a few good years, like Boris Diaw and Stephen Jackson, but are nothing special. They have a few overpaid centers who have done nothing of recent. Where do they go from here?

The only thing working in their favor is that they can still make the playoffs because all the other teams in the bottom half of the East just aren't there. I do think Tyrus Thomas could be a find, and I liked Augustin a lot coming out of college. They might step up (and they'll need to for my money). I just feel like the city is bored with this team.

Projected wins: 37

Indiana Pacers

Hate level: 6

I HATE: I was ready to kill these guys for putting together a horrible roster and the most boring team in the league. Larry Bird has had a rough time as GM and they've been stuck in mediocrity hell for a while. Then they pulled off a sly trade to get Darren Collison without giving up anyone they really needed long term. That kept them from the absolute basement. Now, with some contracts coming off the books, they might just have some hope, but it will take a lot more work.

I feel awful for the Indiana fans, who always support basketball at every level. This is one of the states that really cares and they shouldn't have to watch them put out a team that wins 35 games every year. I know Bird was crippled by the fallout of the Artest melee, but he didn't have to pile up all these bad contract guys. Troy Murphy, Mike Dunleavy, and T.J. Ford were indeed signed by other people, but he picked them up. He also drafted uninspiring guys from the late lottery instead of taking more chances. This kept them in a cycle of being not that great, but not horrible enough to get anyone good.

He might have some promise now with Roy Hibbert, who has shown some low post moves. If Hibbert can be a decent center, and either Brandon Rush or Paul George steps up on the wings, they will have less spots to fill. Danny Granger, though he deserves better, is staying here because he is a solid citizen and nice guy and they need him. He and Collison will put up numbers and make this team somewhat watchable…. Just a little. They are still pretty bad in spots, particularly down low. They are the weakest at power forward in the whole league, and if Hibbert gets in foul trouble, they don't really have much center depth either.

It's going to be another 35 win year, but that may change soon. They have a shot at the playoffs if enough other teams falter.

Projected wins: 35

Washington Wizards

Hate level: 4

I HATE: The way they gave up last year. They dumped four starters for basically nothing. This wouldn't have hurt as much if they didn't already give up a top 5 pick before the season to make a run. They lost a potential top guy for Randy Foye and Mike Miller, both now gone. Horrible. They didn't get any young talent for Caron Butler or Antawn Jamison, just some low draft picks. Awful. Yeah, they were blindsided by the whole gun fiasco, but they could have responded better.

But then the summer came, and they got lucky in the lottery, and they made a few smart changes. They used their cap space to get Kirk Hinrich and Yi, two guys who could contribute right away. They also got some picks. Two big guys they had been working on for years, JaVale McGee and Andray Blatche, developed more. Now they have a more intriguing approach.

The real question is if they can move Gil Arenas. They might want to see how he does off the ball. I always though he'd be a better two guard, a la Iverson, but a guy who is used to having the ball in his hands so much might not adjust. If they can get something out of him, either by making him happy or setting up a deal, they might just be on their way, because John Wall is the real deal.

Projected wins: 31

Philadelphia 76ers

Hate level: 50

I HATE: Oh dear.

Where do I start?

Do I start with them dumping Maurice Cheeks too soon?

Do I start with Eddie Jordan not using anyone properly? Do I start with Doug Collins, who seems like a real reach? What a bizarre coaching carousel. I doubt it's over.

Do I start with them taking Evan Turner even though they already had a bunch of wings who couldn't shoot? They could have traded down and taken Cousins, Favors, Monroe… now Turner is getting bad reviews and probably won't even start on opening night. And since they traded Dalembert, they now have no legit starting center. Wonderful.

Do I start with them handing over too much money to Iguodala, even though he didn't really have any competition? I like him, but he's not worth that much.

I won't even touch Elton Brand because I did endorse that one. I'm as stupid as they were.

Look, they've tried hard to rebuild after letting Iverson go. This is not as bad as the Sixers teams I grew up with that tried to sell us on Shawn Bradley and Sharone Wright. No sir. They are picking up decent guys… it's just that they could be better and spend a lot less cash.

I don't know. I really don't. I like a few things. Jrue Holiday was a nice find at point, Lou Williams is a good combo guard scorer off the bench, and maybe Thad Young will come back. Spencer Hawes should not be a starter, but is fine as a backup, as is Mareese Speights. They're going to go small (as if they had a choice), which worked for them two years ago to get to the playoffs. It wouldn't be a huge shock. But they are going to be murdered down low, on defense, and on the boards.

Maybe they will work out some trades. Maybe Brand will finally come around. But for the most part, I can think of nothing but hate for my hometown team.

Projected wins: 30

Detroit Pistons

Hate level: 6

I HATE: Watching this crummy misfit team. They don't have a center or a point guard, just a bunch of combo forwards and off guards. How did Joe Dumars do so well before? He's lost it. He spent money on positions they already had, traded away their glue guy Billups, and put together a tremendously weird roster. He found some nice young guys in the second round, but he created such a logjam that it's hard to see what his plan is unless he has a bunch of trades coming.

Instead of going after a true center with post moves, they spent a lot on Charlie Villanueva, an outside shooter forward. Then they drafted a couple guys just like him. They brought in Ben Wallace off waivers presumably to be a veteran influence, but he ended up having to play major minutes for them because they didn't have any decent rebounders. They signed Ben Gordon and promoted Rodney Stuckey even though they already had lots of money tied up in Rip Hamilton. I don't get it.

And that's before the Tracy McGrady experiment. Joe D! Pay attention!

I do like Greg Monroe. Even though I think he's more of a forward than a center, he is crafty in the post and they will need him. If they can move Hamilton's big contract (and maybe using Tayshaun Prince's expiring), they will free up some minutes. Until then, I don't see why they get anywhere.

Projected wins: 28

New Jersey Nets

Hate level: 5

I HATE: They got jacked in the summer sweepstakes. I actually really liked what this team was doing the past few years. They had gotten old, and traded away all their guys for draft picks and younger ones. They created enough space and drafted well with the picks they did have to set up a strong run in free agency… except it never happened. Everyone turned them down and they had to overspend on Travis Outlaw just to reach the minimum salary.

I really thought they had a shot at LeBron and some of the other top guys. They had a nice base with Brook Lopez and Devin Harris, and a top draft pick in Derrick Favors. But he said no, and every other major free agent found a home. I still like their base, and if they can get a high scoring wing, they will be dangerous. They are going after Carmelo, but if they have to give up Harris and/or Favors to get him, it will be tough. Their best bet may be to try dealing Troy Murphy for someone during the season, or just waiting until the summer and see what happens.

For now, they will be better than 12 wins. I could see them sneaking into the playoffs if they just had a few more guys. They still need depth and scoring, though, so I am sticking them with around 30 wins. The good news is that they are (almost certainly) moving to Brooklyn, and they will have cap space again, so they can still look ahead.

Projected wins: 26

Cleveland Cavaliers

Hate level: 6

I HATE: I don't hate them. God or some force does. I feel terrible for the good people of Cleveland, who have never done anything to deserve what they have gone through. This is going to be maybe the hardest season anyone has had in the city.

I do have issues with the management. Maybe they never had a chance to keep LeBron. Maybe he was going to bail them with his buddies no matter what. I don't know. I do know that they missed several chances to impress him and get better. They tried, and they spent, but they didn't do it wisely until recent. For example, why didn't more people question signing Larry Hughes? He was not a shooter. He was a combo guard who liked to handle the ball. That was a terrible idea. I know that they went after Michael Redd and Ray Allen first that summer, and both of those guys turned them down. But that move nearly crippled them. It took them way too long to realize that LeBron's driving and passing abilities meant that they should surround him with good shooters. Once they did that, the team got better. They shouldn't have wasted his time with the likes of Hughes and Eric Snow, good passer but not shooters.

Last year, they could have done a lot more with different lineups, going small, and being innovative offensively, but they didn't. They dominated Boston at points in that series but didn't keep it up. That's partly to blame on coaching. It's not all LeBron's fault for their failures. They deserve some hate. [Not to mention Dan Gilbert's silly fonted, spurned-14-year-old girl angry letter. Not smart.]

And for this season, they could have done more. I'm glad they didn't make any panic trades to overpay for a guy to try to replace LeBron, but they could have at least bolstered depth. They barely made any moves at all. This has ensured them a place in the lottery, and that's probably the best way to go in the long term, but then why not trade some of their established guys? If they are going to be bad (they are), and they only traded for Antawn Jamison and Mo Williams to make a run with LeBron (they did), why keep them now? They don't fit a rebuilding plan. They could easily send those guys to contending teams to pick up draft picks and space. They're not big stars and they're not bringing fans in. They need to get on it.

Some have suggested that they could still be a playoff team. Uh, no. This talent level is not that good, and most of these guys were brought in to fit LeBron. Without him, they lose value. Williams isn't a real point guard, Jamison isn't a real big guy, and Varejao is not a scorer. They were good parts to a car that now has no engine. Who is even going to start at small forward? I would compare them to the Wizards, with Jamison and Williams as a Gil Arenas type…. except there's no Caron Butler. And the Wizards haven't been good. No, this team is not going to get close to winning, and they need to realize it. J.J. Hickson and some of the young wings should get more time. They're all that's left.

Projected wins: 22

Toronto Raptors

Hate level: 4

I HATE: Like Cleveland, they got dumped horribly but also didn't make any moves to help. If they didn't make the playoffs with Chris Bosh and Hedo Turkoglu, they sure aren't going to after losing them for mostly nothing. They have a weird collection of wings and big guys who haven't done much. Their point guard battle took so many weird turns last year. They only decent scorer is Andrea Bargnani, who fed off of Bosh. This is going to be horrible.

They tried a few odd cleanup moves to help, but I don't know if they will. Linus Kleiza will have a chance to start, but he didn't do much in Denver when they needed him. Amir Johnson has been a nice energy guy down low, but they gave him a huge contract that just about everyone questioned. Leandro Barbosa can score, but is getting old.

Bryan Colangelo's plan to surround Bosh with a bunch of European players and emulate the Suns didn't work. There are no young studs save for DeMar DeRozan and Ed Davis, and they have questions. So I guess the question isn't if they are worse off than Cleveland, it's if God hates Canada more.

Projected wins: 18

By the way, I did check and my projected wins do add up realistically. They're only an approximation, but it could happen. YEAH! MATH!

…..

So… what does this all mean? Why do I hate so much? So many owners are easy to hate. I realized when making this preview that I can only support a few of them. So many players are earning so much for so little production. The owners decry the dumb contracts, but they gave them out. There is, by all accounts, going to be a lockout next year. They will make changes. I don't want to lose any games, but I know they can't continue like this. Which side do I root for?

But, I love basketball, and I'm curious about all the changes, so I will watch. I will watch and I will give them my money, and I will feel bad about it, but I can't stop.

The NBA! Where people who like basketball have no choice but to watch happens!

More predictions…

FINALS: Lakers over Heat in 6

I'm already dreading it.

CONFERENCE FINALS: Lakers over Mavs, Heat over Magic * - unless Boston gets Orlando in the semis, in which case, Heat over Celtics

MVP: Durant

Too easy. Kobe is taking it easy in the regular season, LeBron & wade cancel out for voters, and Dwight doesn't score enough for voters.

DEF: Dwight Howard

Joakim Noah and Rajon Rondo will get love, but Dwight has owned this.

ROOKIE: John Wall

I like Blake Griffin, but I question his health, and Wall has a better shot at the playoffs because his conference is weaker.

SIXTH MAN: Paul Millsap

Hard one to call. Houston has a few guys who could do it, and there's Jason Terry (but he already won), Lamar Odom, Delonte West, J.J. Redick, Mike Miller (if he's not out too long)… a lot of guys.

MOST IMPROVED: D.J. Augustin

I believe! My fantasy team believes! And he's the only guy at his spot on a team that's not terrible. It works. I also like James Harden, DeMar DeRozan, JaVale McGee, Anthony Randolph, and J.J. Hickson.

ALL NBA: Durant, LeBron, Dwight, CP, Kobe second – Stoudemire, Duncan, Nowitzki, De Williams, Roy

ALL ROOKIE: John Wall, Blake Griffin, DeMarcus Cousins, Wes Johnson, Greg Monroe